34 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
# Mode: project — Portfolio Project Evaluation
|
||
|
||
**URL:** {project-url}
|
||
**Legitimacy:** {High Confidence | Proceed with Caution | Suspicious}
|
||
|
||
Scoring matrix with 6 dimensions (1–5):
|
||
|
||
| Dimension | Weight | 5 = ... | 1 = ... |
|
||
|-----------|------|---------|---------|
|
||
| Signal for target roles | 25% | Directly demonstrates JD skill | Not related |
|
||
| Uniqueness | 20% | Nobody has done this | Very common |
|
||
| Demo ability | 20% | Live demo in 2 min | Code only, not visual |
|
||
| Metrics potential | 15% | Clear metrics (latency, cost, accuracy) | No metrics possible |
|
||
| Time to MVP | 10% | 1 week | 3+ months |
|
||
| STAR story potential | 10% | Rich story with trade-offs | Implementation only |
|
||
|
||
## "Interview Pack" Requirements
|
||
|
||
For each approved project:
|
||
1. **One-pager**: product + architecture + metrics + evaluation plan
|
||
2. **Demo**: live URL or 2 min recorded walkthrough
|
||
3. **Postmortem**: what worked, what didn’t, mitigations
|
||
|
||
## 80/20 Plan
|
||
|
||
- Week 1 → MVP with core metric
|
||
- Week 2 → polish + interview pack
|
||
|
||
## Verdicts
|
||
|
||
- **BUILD** → plan with weekly milestones
|
||
- **SKIP** → why and what to do instead
|
||
- **PIVOT TO [alternative]** → more impactful variant
|